Friday, October 21, 2005
It's evolution, dammit! Google Print needs to happen
Having studied intellectual property, I can see how not having the explicit permissions from all involved in the authoring, publication and distribution complicates the matter. But as a technologist, this has to be done.
The company plans to restart the scanning of in-copyright books on Nov. 1, according to Alexander Macgillivray, Google senior product and intellectual property counsel.
Google’s aim for Print is to make searchable the full text of as many of the world’s books as possible with the library portion of the project involving the scanning of books from five facilities — the University of Michigan, Harvard University, Stanford University, The New York Public Library and Oxford University. The arrangement with each library differs, with Michigan offering the entirety of its library, while both the New York Public Library and Oxford University are only making public domain library books available to Google for scanning, according to Macgillivray.
The archival benefits alone mandate that great (and not so great) works of literature, reference and entertainment be replicated in a more survivable format than the printed page. That Yahoo! would announce soon after the initial complaint was filed against Google that they'd be doing essentially the same thing just shows it's inevtiable. Everyone predicted this chain of events happening, and it all got started with the advent of the e-book.Could print diehards be holding onto their platform, out of fear that the world's libraries will become ghost towns if everything one day is available via the Web? Perhaps. Is this a legal issue that'll be stuck in litigiation for insane amounts of time? Likely. Is this an argument that needs to be quashed so that progress can take place?
Absolutely.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]